The brief proposes pricing GPU time for agent swarms in a "sovereign token" whose value rises when GPUs are scarce (long queues, high utilization, expensive power) and falls when capacity sits idle. The idea is that prices then steer demand toward spare capacity, and buyers can hedge future costs.
This page simulates 90 days of one buyer's GPU use in three regions with invented demand and energy prices. It compares three ways to pay: a fixed hourly rate, the token-indexed rate, and a common hedge (most hours reserved at a fixed rate, overflow at the floating rate). Change the sliders and watch which method makes the buyer's bill more predictable.
| Pricing | 90-day cost | Daily cost swing (CV) | Next-month forecast miss |
|---|
CV is standard deviation of daily cost divided by its mean. Forecast miss compares days 61–90 against a forecast built from days 31–60. Lower is more predictable. Seller idle capacity: .
Real demand and energy data per region, a counterparty willing to sell futures, and a legal review: a token whose value floats with a market is likely to be treated as a financial instrument. The fleet today rents CPU VPS servers and pays per-token API bills, so there is no GPU capacity to price.